Dunhill London
Dunhill (2008)

Not bad. Sweet fruits and sandalwood. Light and inoffensive.
This was an accidental buy. I totally disliked at first but this one grew on me and I received complements when wearing Dunhill London. I still prefer Dunhill Fresh though, which is a cleaner fragrance with better longevity.

Bland...inoffensive, but unremarkable. Very light opening of apples and vanilla that reminds me more of stewed fruits prepared for canning as the notes are so light and watery. There is a very mild soapy quality at the heart of this. Disappears after 3 hours at most. Certainly doesn't project at all. Wears close to the skin and ephemerally at that.

A pleasant enough tonka/sandalwood scent. But it's far too weak - I have had aftershaves much stronger than this EDT. Can't understand Dunhill letting this go out in this strength.

A light, fruity-slice nigh aquatic top note with a rose and vanilla drydown that remains very lightweight with some mild freshness. Projection and silage are ok, longevity is about two hours, but on my skin it remains insipid and full of synthetic dullness.

Initially, I liked this one....after purchasing blindly (at a discout price). Kinda sweet and powerdy, not as sophisticated as I would expect from something called "London". Does not last long - and I can't remember anyone complimenting me on it...not even my wife.
I wore it for several months until the bottle was gone, and never really felt as if it was a standout. I might try it again in the summer, but for now it's a retired fragrance for me.

Saccharin-sweet toilet freshener comes to mind when freshly sprayed onto the skin. Dries down to a overtly feminine and dud scent that could not even be passed for metrosexual. The concept behind this fragrance is confused, and I can honestly see no place for it in any of the prevalent demographics of London.

Perhaps they should have called it: 'Dunhill Brighton' or something.