The “sport” fragrance as we know it today is a bit difficult to define, and for some people, the “sport” descriptor can mean any number of things from throwaway fresh scents to something particularly deodorizing for use after physical exercise. For others, a “sport” fragrance needs to have a duly sporty aesthetic, defined by the notions of such, which change with the wind as fashion itself does, decade to decade.
So then, what exactly is a “sport” fragrance to you? Furthermore, do we really need a perfume to feel sporty or physically fit, active, or healthy? All of these aren’t exactly important questions in the grand scheme of things, but they can be fun to ask from time to time, and the only real answers we can provide concerning the existence of “sport” fragrances come from tracking their history, which is also difficult.
It’s impossible now to truly say what the very first “sport” fragrance was, since people used traditional eaux de cologne after physical exertion in lieu of drawing a bath, which was difficult in the days before common indoor plumbing or accessible water heating. Instead of using a wash basin to give a hand bath, some people would just splash on the fresh, bracing scent of something like 4711 with its high alcohol content to do the trick.
In the UK and early pre-civil war US, a term known as “Jockey Club” became a popular one to describe bracing, sport-like fragrances meant to be used after exertion or to imply an active, virile form for men in particular, serving up perhaps one of the very earliest tropes for “men’s cologne” in the process as well, with one notable survivor from old US perfumer Caswell-Massey just called Jockey Club, purportedly launched in 1840 by the brand. It’s odd mix of powdery florals and civet musk under a lime opening is the furthest thing from the modern imagination as to what constitutes a sporty smell, but it is fun to wear.
The earliest use of the term “sport” in a fragrance I could personally find comes from 1925 with Lanvin’s Après Sport – a scent that lasted but a single year – and was joined by perfumer André Fraysse’s short-lived Cross Country in the same year. Both were ostensibly replaced by the Eau Mixte series of lower-concentration perfumes. L’Eau de Lanvin (1933), which was a shared scent that could act as a base to layer the lighter variations of other Lanvin perfumes on top, served both as an early attempt at deliberately marketed unisex scent, and as a “sport” fragrance in and of itself.
40 Love by Jean Desprez would launch in 1947, being a perfume ode to the game of tennis, and would be another “sport” scent in spirit, even if it didn’t have specific naming as such. This one would not be gender-marketed at first, although eventually it became considered a man’s fragrance due to its stout, sour floral nature, as bracing or sour fragrances with tart citrus and yellowish-hue musk profiles became the rage for men in the immediate postwar years. Lacoste would soon pick up this ball (pun intended) into the 1960’s, with our next wave of well-noted sport themes.
The time between likely saw many less-notable releases a non-exhaustive article such as this one cannot possibly mention, including things themed after other sports, including racquetball, race car driving, golf, or rugby. Lacoste is a brand that traces its roots to René Lacoste, a famed tennis player-turned-designer that wanted to launch a line of sporting apparel that eventually led to Jean Patou linking up with him to release fragrances under an early form of licensed branding. Lacoste Eau de Sport (1967) was one such result, and it cracked the door wide open for future fragrances into the 1970’s with the theme.
Everyone from Estée Lauder to Jovan ended up releasing some form of “sport” themed fragrance into the 1970’s, most of them taking the approach of assuming that high body heat from physical activity or time spent outdoors meant a lighter scent was needed, one that blended harmoniously with sweat instead of smacked it with a deodorizing sledgehammer of aroma chemicals, leaving a bit of that natural virility in the perspiration present and blending with it instead of covering it up. The heightened sexual expressions popular in the mainstream culture of the day likely made this more acceptable than now.
As the use of perfume itself grew more common in the 1980’s, and fragrances grew louder or more ostentatious, the “sport” scent shifted semantically towards being “the mild version” of whatever mainline pillar release it was flanking, rather than a dedicated original scent line of its own. We saw notable releases on the men’s sales counter like Antaeus Sport by Chanel, Kouros Eau de Sport by Yves Saint Laurent, Sport de Paco Rabanne, all in successive order; each of these an attempt at a smoother or lighter alternative to their popular mainstay entries.
The most intriguing thing would be how short lived they all were too, while Lacoste continued issuing sporty standalone releases that weren’t alternatives to anything stronger. Paradigms shifted again into the 1990’s, and “sport” was realigned to mean a potent but deodorizing fresh scent seemingly a flanker to something else but altogether unrelated to it, banking on popular “aquatic” or “ozonic” aesthetics entering the mainstream due to successful releases like Cool Water by Davidoff at the tail end of the preceding decade. Polo Sport by Ralph Lauren from 1993 is a huge notable example of this shift.
From there, things start to really lose their way as more brands crowded onto shelves, more options presented themselves to the average customer, and everyone wanted to carve out a unique angle of attack on the average consumer wallet. The concept of “sport” also became increasingly linked to the men’s fragrance market, so women sadly stopped being presented these options equally, and eventually not at all into the 21st century. Meanwhile, the term “sport” became replaced in many instances with other abstract descriptors like “blue/bleu” or “fresh/fraiche”, and even further down the line “eau/l’eau” as brands scrambled to make more and more lighter, casual, non-committal scent options as the winds of trend blew in that direction.
The term “sport” hasn’t stopped appearing as a descriptor for this flanker or that, but more often than not, they prove to be throwaway nomenclature for a fragrance that neither smells nor makes the user feel sporty in any meaningful way. Early on as 1998, Liz Claiborne released a “sport” scent that was little more than a carbon copy of Calvin Klein’s Eternity for Men with some DNA pinched from the popular Curve for Men by Liz Claiborne.
When Chanel launched Allure Homme Sport in 2004, it was really just to save face against low sales for the original Allure Homme released in 1999, shamelessly copying the style of the best-selling Acqua Di Giò pour Homme by Giorgio Armani. Allure Homme Sport Extrême from 2012 proved an even further deviation with its sweet tonka-led focus. It becomes impossible to have expectations for what’s in that bottle when the term “sport” is exploited on the front.
Brands now just throw “sport” on anything, like Prada’s puzzlingly-sweeter juniper-led Luna Rossa Sport from 2015 that received a lighter sub-flanker in Prada Luna Rossa Eau Sport a few years later in 2017, as if it should have been the original “sport” entry itself; and even more vexing is the standalone Azzaro Sport from 2020, a vapid fresh scent rebooted in 2022 with a slightly different bottle with a scent reminiscent of Fierce Cologne by Abercrombie & Fitch, a whopping twenty years prior.
So again, it must be asked what does “sport” mean in the context of fragrance? The brands making these things surely don’t know anymore, if they ever did. History has shown us that the intentions were well-meaning in the beginning, and a style emergent from a need or desire that shifted over time as anything cultural often does; but now we have landed in a state of “in case we have no better answer”, make it a “sport” fragrance, and that feels very unsportsmanlike, if you ask me.
Related Posts
(One minor correction - the model for Polo Sport is actually Tyson Beckford, not Tyson Ballou.)
Too often these fragrances are maligned and not simply appreciated for what they are. An excellent perspective is offered here. 🍺
Any more, my cynical side sees the "sport" moniker purely as a marketing artifact. An undifferentiated scent with a sleek semi-industrial look and "Sport" on it for the customer who fancies themselves as an athlete who uses athletic products. It's not about the scent. The scent might be objectively great. But the larger point is making people feel secure in the purchase.
To me, 'sport' fragrances are one of two things: meant for sporty activity (liberal interpretation of what sport) and second, a less serious flanker of a main fragrance.
Sometimes a sport flanker is intended to be used for sporty activities.
But that’s what I was thinking when they finally released BdC in bar soap form. Interested, but $80 for one bar of soap is like flipping the bird to loyal fans. A shameful way to treat customers, right up there with Chanel’s infamous advent calendar debacle.
Yup, I'm that much of a goofball. The movie wasn't a match up to the trailer, which was good.
For me, Challnger's is a Grand Slam. I come from an era where we had Tennis Gods.
Billy Jean King vs Bobby Riggs. John McEnroe vs Jimmy Connors, Chris Evert, Arthur Ashe, the list goes on.
I think the gods aspect came from the lack of other TV channels and we owned actual rackets instead of wii controls.
I'd like to add two sports fragrances, at least to me. Floris JF and the superior green bottle AdP's Country Club.
I picked up both for very good prices. JF for about $50/50ml and a 50ml of Country Club Green Bottle for $36.
I liked Country Club so much that I got a 100ml.
I have been picking up Dior Homme Sport recently. Why, compared to other vintages of Dior, the price is respectable.
I should be getting a 2017, the least-liked by the community for $60. It's a 125ml. I should be getting that today.
I have a 2012 sealed and I did pay up a little bit for a sealed 2008. The batch was a first year issued, 2008.
I haven't sampled the 2022. Getting that one on a good deal is like trying to hit one of the Willam's serves.
If you are looking for any of the Dior Sports, here are a few pointers.
The 2008 and 2012 will not have the Dior Bee on the box.
The 2008 Dior face plate will be black and the 2012 will be silver grey.
The 2017 will have the Bee as the 2022, but will not have the new Dior logo on the cap.
BTW, I spritzed on Polo Sport/Cosmair before seeing this article.
I kinda felt compelled to comment.