Matsuri fragrance notes
We have no fragrance notes for this fragrance – if you know them, let us know!Latest Reviews of Matsuri
The opening blends ylang-ylang - the main player - with an orange note, and they are soon joined by a mild whiff of clove; the latter is very mild on not likely got scare Dracula away. Then a bit of peony strengthens the floral side, and this all is mixed together.
The drydown is developing a jasmine-lilac duet, and this floral phase is occasionally enhanced by a peony impression. Further towards the end, fruitiness from a peach aroma is evident.
I get moderate sillage, adequate projection and six hours of longevity in my skin.
I can't see much of a holiday in this, unless it's the neighbour's garden. And not a very fragrant garden it is; all the notes are fairly generic and dull on my skin, in spite of being quite synthetic. 2/5
The drydown is developing a jasmine-lilac duet, and this floral phase is occasionally enhanced by a peony impression. Further towards the end, fruitiness from a peach aroma is evident.
I get moderate sillage, adequate projection and six hours of longevity in my skin.
I can't see much of a holiday in this, unless it's the neighbour's garden. And not a very fragrant garden it is; all the notes are fairly generic and dull on my skin, in spite of being quite synthetic. 2/5
Trying this was a strange quick ride.
On first impact, I was blasted by a really strong smell - reminding me of floral bathroom sprays of the 70's after grandma left (god bless her.) It came on strong, sweet and sickly. I got no woods and very little spice like I was expecting.
In 15 minutes, 2/3 of the retro sweetness falls away to a lighter and more tolerable sweet floral with maybe some tea? Some people might like it at this point - and I would have liked it more if the sweetness was replaced with spice.
In a half hour most of it is gone entirely and I have to put my nose directly onto my wrist to smell anything at all -- and what's left to my nose is a very, very light (rosey?) floral combined with something clean and aquatic, -- its almost invisible.
Someone who likes spicier woodsier scents might be disappointed with this. But someone who likes floral soapy scents might appreciate the end of the ride if they can tolerate the first 20 minutes.
On first impact, I was blasted by a really strong smell - reminding me of floral bathroom sprays of the 70's after grandma left (god bless her.) It came on strong, sweet and sickly. I got no woods and very little spice like I was expecting.
In 15 minutes, 2/3 of the retro sweetness falls away to a lighter and more tolerable sweet floral with maybe some tea? Some people might like it at this point - and I would have liked it more if the sweetness was replaced with spice.
In a half hour most of it is gone entirely and I have to put my nose directly onto my wrist to smell anything at all -- and what's left to my nose is a very, very light (rosey?) floral combined with something clean and aquatic, -- its almost invisible.
Someone who likes spicier woodsier scents might be disappointed with this. But someone who likes floral soapy scents might appreciate the end of the ride if they can tolerate the first 20 minutes.
Your Tags
By the same house...
Annayaké Pour ElleAnnayaké (2000)
An'naAnnayaké (2011)
YukimiAnnayaké (2004)
Love for HimAnnayaké (2013)
KuroiAnnayaké (2014)
TOMOAnnayaké (2007)
Niji for HimAnnayaké (2016)
Kogaï for HerAnnayaké (2022)
Kogaï for HimAnnayaké (2022)
Kagari for HimAnnayaké (2023)
Kagari for HerAnnayaké (2023)
Mood for a Dream WomanAnnayaké (2024)
Other fragrances from 2006
Burberry London for MenBurberry (2006)
Black Orchid Eau de ParfumTom Ford (2006)
Terre d'HermèsHermès (2006)
Encre NoireLalique (2006)
Bright CrystalVersace (2006)
Burberry LondonBurberry (2006)
Molecule 01Escentric Molecules (2006)
Ralph HotRalph Lauren (2006)
Cuir OttomanParfum d'Empire (2006)
Blu Mediterraneo : Fico di AmalfiAcqua di Parma (2006)
With Love... Hilary DuffHilary Duff (2006)
RienEtat Libre d'Orange (2006)