My guess was from the house of Dior too, not Fahrenheit though.Seems like a modern spin on Dior Farenheit was my first guess, although it's lacking in the leather department?
So how close were we?
My guess was from the house of Dior too, not Fahrenheit though.Seems like a modern spin on Dior Farenheit was my first guess, although it's lacking in the leather department?
There were definitely multiple reformulations, and this formula combines some aspects of each.Is it a famous fragrance (that got reformulated and now sucks)...one that never appears on discount fragrance sites...
I think I know
Not even close.Seems like a modern spin on Dior Farenheit was my first guess, although it's lacking in the leather department?
Not Dior.My guess was from the house of Dior too, not Fahrenheit though.
So how close were we?
It's < 1/10 as much MHC as is in Dior Fahrenheit (altho this formula does also have some other violet-ish molecules). This formula does exert a quite powerful purple violet effect.That's a bunch of MOC AND MHC!
NOAP!L'Envol EDP?
Fair enough. I haven't used violettyne before and wasn't sure. I'll try and make this in the next few days.It's < 1/10 as much MHC as is in Dior Fahrenheit (altho this formula does also have some other violet-ish molecules). This formula does exert a quite powerful purple violet effect.
NOAP.If I'm allowed a second attempt, I'd say Paris (Lancome, 1983; S. Grojsman).
Sorry, but where have I said "no" to Insolence?This thread is like having a friend that shows you a good card trick but won’t tell you how it’s done.
I was in agreement with Insolence solely looking at the formula but you’re saying “no”, so I have no idea. I know it’s powdery though lol
Ok fine, I interpreted two “maybes” as a “NOAP”.Sorry, but where have I said "no" to Insolence?
MAYBE!Ok fine, I interpreted two “maybes” as a “NOAP”.
Potential’s high for Insolence.
What does that mean? Close, but not close enough? One of its flankers (Insolence)?MAYBE!
I’M GETTING ANGRYYYYYY!!!!!!MAYBE!